news

Fancy Beach Whitbed technical data

This technical data sheet was compiled by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) at the request of Albion Stone and is updated by Albion Stone to incorporate current test results. The 866 tests have been carried out in accordance with current European standards by the BRE on Albion Stone's behalf, or by other accredited testing houses. The early test data that pre-dates the introduction of Euro-codes has been included providing the test methods were very similar. The work carried out by the BRE on this technical data sheet has been undertaken as a paid commission and does not represent an endorsement of the stone by the BRE.

This data includes the Lowest and Highest Expected Values (LEV & HEV) using the statistical calculations from the Euro-codes. We are confident that these results give a good indication of the stones value, but as it is a natural material we, like other stone producers, are unable to guarantee individual results for specific stones. Instead, we recommend that an appropriate factor of safety is used to ensure satisfactory performance, Annex 1 of the Technical Manual provides further information, but we suggest that a suitably qualified stone consultant with geological and testing experience is employed to provide further information.

Petrography

The stone was classified as a moderately sorted, moderately compacted, clast supported Oosparite Limestone.  The clasts were predominantly composed of ooliths, but mollusc shell and echinoderm fragments and quartz were also present.  The matrix was composed of sparitic syntaxial carbonate and some micritic carbonate.  There was a moderate to high abundance of open voidage space.  There was possibly some evidence of sedimentary bedding by the preferred alignment of elongate clasts.

(For a full Petrographic description of this stone, please contact us on 01737 771772 or email sales@albionstone.com)

Strength

Compression - BS EN 1926
Lowest Expected Value 35.53 Mpa
Highest Expected Value 61.06 Mpa
Average: 47.04 Mpa from 26 tests

Flexural Strength - BS EN 13161
Lowest Expected Value 3.29 Mpa
Highest Expected Value 8.93 Mpa
Average: 6.11 Mpa from 72 tests

Breaking Load at Dowel Hole - BS EN 13364:2002

Specimen Thickness (mm)	Mean Breaking Load (N)	Lowest Expected Value (N) / Highest Expected Value (N)
30	667	548 / 803
40	1191	941 / 1489
50	1860	1498 / 2298
60	2249	1810 / 2764
75	4667	3749 / 5668

 

Durability

Water Absorption - BS EN 13755
Lowest Expected Value 3.88%
Highest Expected Value 9.01%
Average: 6.05% from 36 tests

Density - BS EN 1936
Lowest Expected Value 2,003 kg/m³
Highest Expected Value 2,321 kg/m³
Average: 2,158 kg/m³ from 47 tests

Porosity - BS EN 1936
Lowest Expected Value 13.57%
Highest Expected Value 26.23%
Average: 19.17% from 64 tests

Saturation Coefficient - BS EN 1936
Lowest Expected Value 0.56
Highest Expected Value 0.92
Average: 0.73 from 22 tests

Salt Crystallisation – BS EN 12370
Lowest Expected Value 0.00%
Highest Expected Value 6.14%
Average: 2.05%

Technical summary

Prepared by: Dr T Yates, BRE (Building Research Establishment)

Durability and Weathering
It is important that the results from the sodium sulphate crystallisation tests are not viewed in isolation.  They should be considered with the results from the porosity and water absorption tests and the performance of the stone in existing buildings. Stone from the Portland Whitbed is traditionally acknowledged as generally being a very durable building stone and it has been used extensively in many towns and cities in the UK. Comparing the results for the Whitbed Stone from Jordans Quarry to those collected from buildings, exposure trials and tests on quarry samples collected by BRE during the last 70 years shows that this stone compares very well with the traditional view of Portland Whitbed. Previous research at BRE has shown that Portland limestone which has a low saturation coefficient (<0.72), a low microporosity (<11.0 of the stone by volume) and an open oolitic structure generally performs well over long periods when used on buildings. The results summarised on these sheets show that the limited number of samples tested meet these criteria. The average  crystallisation test results show the stone to be Class C which BRE Report 141 suggests is suitable for most uses including where exposure conditions are to be more severe, for example high concentrations of sulphur dioxide or severe frosts, or where a long life is required (for example >50 years). In all cases it is important that the detailing of the stonework is designed to offer the maximum protection from rainwater and rainwater runoff.

Based on current research it seems likely that the stone would weather at a rate of between 1 and 2 mm per 100 years but it could be greater in severe exposures.

(Weathering rates are based on the BRE interpretation of historical data dating from 1932)

 

top of page